This section collects maintainer-facing reports about the Quartz garden itself.

These pages are useful when the question is not “what does the model research say?” but instead:

  • what parts of the graph are hidden or weakly linked?
  • which hubs are doing real routing work versus duplicating each other?
  • how should the garden surface its strongest research paths?

Included reports

Quartz structure and navigation

Scope boundary

These are editorial and information-architecture documents, not research claims about Parameter Golf mechanisms.

For model ideas, use:

Highest-level takeaway

The garden’s main problem is no longer a lack of content. It is routing:

  • strong layers like frontiers, challenge history, and ideas need to be surfaced more explicitly
  • the best research paths should be visible from the top-level hubs
  • maintainer-facing audits should stay separated from the main LLM research graph

7 items under this folder.