This section collects maintainer-facing reports about the Quartz garden itself.
These pages are useful when the question is not “what does the model research say?” but instead:
- what parts of the graph are hidden or weakly linked?
- which hubs are doing real routing work versus duplicating each other?
- how should the garden surface its strongest research paths?
Included reports
Link and graph audits
- Executive link-densification audit
- Orphans and hidden clusters
- Missing bridge page audit
- High-value backlink opportunities
Quartz structure and navigation
- Quartz UX and information-architecture audit
- Quartz structural proposal
- Quartz theme system proposal
Scope boundary
These are editorial and information-architecture documents, not research claims about Parameter Golf mechanisms.
For model ideas, use:
Highest-level takeaway
The garden’s main problem is no longer a lack of content. It is routing:
- strong layers like frontiers, challenge history, and ideas need to be surfaced more explicitly
- the best research paths should be visible from the top-level hubs
- maintainer-facing audits should stay separated from the main LLM research graph